Someone wrote me to say they were going on a trip to Cuzco and the Sacred Valley in Peru in April. They'd read that my guests were sometimes offered magic mushrooms on my trips and wondered if I could turn them on to someone who might do a mushroom ceremony for them. I responded with the story of how magic mushrooms came to be used in the Iquitos area. This is it:
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Someone wrote me to say they were going on a trip to Cuzco and the Sacred Valley in Peru in April. They'd read that my guests were sometimes offered magic mushrooms on my trips and wondered if I could turn them on to someone who might do a mushroom ceremony for them. I responded with the story of how magic mushrooms came to be used in the Iquitos area. This is it:
Saturday, December 28, 2013
Well, well, well. I have not written about food in a while, so I thought I'd put one up there for the fun of it. I was going through the left overs in the fridge earlier today and realized we've been eating pretty well lately. First, Madeleina and I have cut out rice and potatoes and pasta most nights. Maybe two nights a week. Bread we have once every couple of weeks in the form of a hamburger bun or a burrito or if I make a nice hot roast beef sandwich with freshly roasted sweet red peppers and a slice of good pepperjack cheese. Otherwise, no bread--except for November, when a friend sent us a dozen bagels from Zabars in NYC. We had three bagels each in a week; the remainder are in the freezer.
So we're not doing much carbo from bread, pasta, potatoes or rice. We have substituted a nice salad nightly. It's a mix of organic romaine and organic spring mix greens, topped with organic cherry or other small tomatoes, a bit of feta on Madeleina's salad; I take a bit of good blue cheese. She takes Ken's Steakhouse light ranch dressing; I take a homemade olive oil/balsamic vinegar/minced shallot/bit of seared garlic. And if you're making a nice vinagrette, forget the 3-1 or 2-1 oil to vinegar ratio: If you have good vinegar, whatever type you like, hit it at about 1-1 with your olive oil and that vinegar will come on strong.
Then we have a veggie or two and a main thing. So, in no particular order, what we have had in the last week or so was:
--Thick piece of chuck steak, seared black, sliced thinly and sauteed with muchrooms/onions with juice from a fresh orange and a bit of Lee and Perrins' Worcestershire sauce. Served with steamed broccoli and cauliflower florets and a thick slice of organic beefsteak tomato sauteed in pan juices and topped with parmesan cheese.
--Swordfish, sauteed in garlic infused olive oil. When near done, add diced red pepper, chopped red onion, diced scallions, coarse sea salt and coarse black pepper. When near finished, add capers with liquid, served over steamed asparagus.
--Chopped meat sauteed with spinach, garlic, onion, broccoli, cauliflower, diced tomato, diced zuccini and yellow squash. Saute the meat, pour off fat. Steam zuccini, broccoli, cauliflower and yellow squash, then add to pan with chopped meat. Add tomatoes, onion, garlic. Add good white vinegar to a bite. Add minced habaneros from my friend Lynn's garden. Stir in a couple of packets of Goya's Achiote con Culantro, a couple of slices of good cheddar and top with fresh cilantro. Serve over good brown or, in our case, garliced-basmati rice.
--Sopa de Mariscos--Three sticks of celery and a diced red onion sauteed in garlic and olive oil till transparent. Add a dozen fresh, cleaned shrimp, a dozen fresh mussels, a few fresh bay scallops, some fresh calamari and scungilli, cut small. When half-way cooked, add a couple of diced Roma tomatoes, a can of organic veggie broth, a can of good quality tomato soup (I know, but I was running late and needed a quick meal) and a good dash of Crab Boil. Don't overdue that last one: Crab boil is HOT.
Stir that all around for 5 minutes, toss in a bit of vermicelli for a few minutes. Salt and pepper to taste, add minced cilantro to bottom of soup bowl and serve the zupa over that. Good stuff.
--Corned Beef and Cabbage: That was Christmas. Good old 5 hour corned beef with fresh cabbage wedgies and potatoes added in the last hour of cooking. Add pickling spice, lots of coarse ground pepper and good white vinegar as you're cooking. And don't forget a good stone-ground mustard.
--Salmon filets sauteed high and hot in olive oil. Keep them clean except for coarse sea salt and coarse black pepper. Start on meat side when pan is scalding hot. When you turn them onto the skin side you keep the skin burning/drying until it's nearly candied, then add a good dash of teriyaki sauce to finish the candifying of the skin. When done to a pink inside, remove from heat. Add a bit more olive oil with garlic, diced onions/a couple of gorgeous scallions, a bit of white vinegar, minced fresh ginger and a diced tomato or red pepper. Served over a bed of steamed spinach.
--Chicken Wings--buy em, cut em, line a pan with celery stalks or onion, and after washing them, put the wings on the veggie bed. A little salt and pepper, garlic olive oil and then bake at 325 until done. Remove from heat. Put whatever dressings you like in bowls and stir in a few of the wings. One bowl might have barbeque sauce, another hot wing sauce, another garlic and teriyaki with orange zest. Whatever you like. Serve with salad and fresh organic celery.
I guess we're killing a lot of veggies and fish and meat. And in the mornings we've been making smoothies from banana, yoghurt, strawberries, raspberries, blueberries and black berries. No sugar necessary. We alternate that with juice of celery, spinach, beets, green apple and carrots--no need to add anything to that baby.
Anyway, any of these that you try will be expensive but fantastically delicious. And you'll wind up only eating a few ounces of the meat or fish because it's all so good you'll spend your time just drooling while you eat.
And I haven't said anything about stuffed pork chops, babyback ribs, burritos from left over anything, an occasional whole baked chicken with gravy or a million other things.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 3:54 PM
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Everyone: I hope this holiday season, however you celebrate it, is something special for you, your family, your friend. I hope the new year brings unimaginably wonderful surprises that upend your world and leave you gasping for breath for the glory of it all. I hope all of you get to feel the spirit of the plants, the spirit of your ancestors', the love of your parents and children and friends.
If we could each feel that love, accept it, digest it, serve it back up to someone else, well, the world would have a lot more love in it than it currently has. So take it, hold it, share it. You and I are family and you and your friends are family to me. It might be distant but we are all one family. Let's make this family rock. Let's make this family sing in harmony. We don't need no stinking hegemony, we just need harmony. And you have the spirit. You have the courage. Start it, spread it. If we could ever get 7 Billion people singing the same song at the same time all over this world, the healing would begin. And it would begin ferociously. Happy new year, everyone. Let's start a song that brings us all together because we are just a family. Broken a lot, but still a family.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 5:06 PM
Sunday, December 22, 2013
So someone in deep depression has written me again asking where I go to drink ayahuasca and whether he/she will ever be able to feel whole again. This is what I wrote:
I sing a lot here at home. I sometimes do ceremonies here. I go to the jungle a couple of times a year and spend some days being very quiet while my guests drink the medicine and sometimes I have a little too. Can you feel good again? Yes. Will you? That is up to you. If you fall in love with feeling badly, then you will have a hard time letting that go. And if you don't let that go, there won't be room for the good feelings to come into you. You are going to have to make some space for feeling like you used to feel--or better. And right now a lot of your space is taken up with negativity--at least that's what I think you're telling me. So you have to get rid of some of that negativity to make space for positivity. Hard, I know, but not very different than wanting to put new furniture in a room. If the room is already filled with old furniture, there is no room for the new furniture. So you have to let go of that old stuff, just pick it up and throw it out, then clean the room, maybe paint it, and then there will be room for the new furniture.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 7:11 AM
Friday, December 13, 2013
I wonder sometimes, what makes rich people tick. Madeleina, my beautiful daughter, asked me the other day why Napolean wasn't content with owning/ruling half the world and risked and lost everything going after Russia as well. I wonder why the Walton family, owners of Walmart, can't be content with 20 billion each and a couple of billion more coming in every year. Why do they have to put their workers in a position to make you and I pay for their food stamps, Section 8 housing and such when they could just raise the wages and still make hundreds of millions each per annum?
These are serious questions in an age where the internet allows us regular people a glimpse of how much the truly rich really make--in terms of money--and really contribute, in terms of society.
The best answer I know came to me while on an Amazon riverboat between Iquitos, Peru and Jenero Herrera, Peru. It's a flat-bottomed riverboat, same type--though with stronger engines--that's plied the Amazon river basin and other parts of the globe since internal combustion engines came to be. Hundreds of people bring hammocks and set them up anywhere they want on the boat's two or three floors; goods fill the bodega--the hull--and most of the bottom floor: coming to Iquitos that means thousands of sacks of cement and rice and toilets and school desks and fresh fish and plantains and such; going from Iquitos that means thousands of bricks, tons of soda, beer, three-wheeled tuc-tuc motorcars and such.
Hammocks are hung everywhere: It's a spiderweb of them on every boat, and along with them, people from the jungle bring almost everything they own, as leaving your home in the jungle unattended allows anyone who wants to take your things to take them legally, claiming you've abandoned them. It's an old tradition but one that still has people packing up their pots and pans and clothes and such before they head to the big city to get a pension check or new government papers for their kids.
So the boat is damned crowded. I always traveled that way until I began to take guests out to the jungle. I discovered that too many were losing cameras and clothes and decided, years ago, to get cabins for them in which they could stash their stuff. The cabins are very simple: Light, bed, fan, tiny table. They're not comfortable but they allow you to protect your stuff while you go up to the bow to take photos of the sunset or night sky.
The boat I use has an area that is closed to the public. People cannot walk from the rear of the boat to the bow: There is a closed wooden slat fence/gate that keeps the hammock people away from the three cabins--as well as the captain's cabin, where the money is kept--and a fence at the bow to keep people from coming in that way. I pay good money for that little space for my guests: We might rent 6-7 cabins altogether, with most downstairs, where everyone can walk through the cabin space, but upstairs, behind the riverboat's pilot, no one not with the captain or the people who have those three cabins are allowed to enter. So my guests have this 30' by 9' space to themselves. We line up the chairs on the starboard side going upriver and my guests can put their cameras down on the boat deck, go downstairs to buy a beer or just look around, or go to the small private bathroom and not worry that their things will be gone when they come back. It's the only real private space on a riverboat in all of Western Peruvian Amazonia. And I take it, because my guests just might be offered local magic mushrooms and I don't want their dream interfered with by having to think: Where did I put my camera? Did I put a couple of pieces of fruit somewhere? Where was that?
No. Our space is private. People sneak in, of course, but I'm a good watchdog and take a seat by the bow and when people come in I let them use our bathroom/our toilet paper/our soap but when they decide they want to put a hammock up in our space, I just don't allow it. And that only takes a word or three from me to get them to realize that I've paid for the space and my guests and no one else is allowed. So my guests come up from the cabins on the lower floor and are free to roam, leaving their stuff, for the duration of the 14-15 hour ride, from bright afternoon sunshine through 3 AM stars.
The dream I mentioned at the start of this, the one that connects this boat to the Koch Brothers, the Waltons and some of the other rich rich rich people, is this:
I had served magic mushrooms, with prayers, to 9-12 people. I was ripped out of my head from inhaling them. I drank a little ayahuasca to say hello to the river--with full private ceremony--and when all was said and done, I started to fall asleep. Serving medicine always makes me fall asleep. Or fall into a dream.
In my dream, I was leaning against the wooden slat fence/gate in a sitting position. People on the other side of that slat fence/gate, in the hammock free-for-all section, were reaching through the wooden slats and touching my hair, my face, my clothes. I brushed them away. I brushed them away as cloying hands that were dirty, filthy, trying to touch me, trying to infect me, trying to get what I had, trying to steal from me. But in the dream I could not move away from the fence. I was stuck to it and so I couldn't move away: The best I could do was slap them away. But there were so many hands, so many dirty hands trying to touch me that I desperately tried to move away. I did not want their filth near me. I did not want their infection, their sores, their open wounds, on my hair, my face, my neck, my clothes, my being. They were filthy. They would tear me down to their level, down to the level of the hammock people in a second. They would have me as dirty as they were. They would infect me just by being alive and near me!
I awoke with a start. I realized I'd fallen asleep sitting up against the wooden fence/gate. I felt a hand on my hair and another on my infected leg. I turned: Two small children were touching me: One touching my gray locks; the other my wounded, sorely infected leg. Other children were there as well, pointing to my leg, some of them suggesting remedies--though the leg had already started to gangrene and would need four operations with skin graft to heal--to help me. They were beautiful. They were in the hammock space so they had to crawl under hammocks to get anywhere so they were all dirty from crawling on the boat's oxidizing steel deck. Really, they were beautiful. They were curious. They were magic incarnate.
In the same moment I saw those angels, I remembered/felt/relived the terror I had in the dream, the terror of not being able to get away from those dirty people, those people who wanted to infect me, to touch me and slime me and bring me down to where they lived in shit-rotten hovels. And in that moment, that moment between loving those beautiful kids and remembering the dream of dreading them, I had a glimpse of how some of the rich rich rich people see us: We are filthy. We carry infections, disease, and any contact with us will make them dirty, rotten, reduce them.
And so, for those people--and it is not all the rich people by any means, but certainly some--the need to accumulate more, build bigger walls, stronger fences to keep us from getting near them, from putting our filthy hands on them, is a real need. And for those people, a billion dollars is not enough separation. 10 Billion is not enough. 20, 30, 40 billion, with private islands that only they can access, is not enough to satisfy the urge, the need to be separated from the rest of us.
And in that same moment, it suddenly became easy to forgive them. They are afraid. They are terribly afraid that interaction with us, with regular people, with poor people, with even middle class people, will leave them infected/wounded/hurt/diminished. They have no control over that fear. They suffer from it but don't realize it's a disease: We are the beautiful ones. We are clean with dirty clothes because we work. We are the angels that could save them and would never hurt them. They can't see that. Their insular world cannot allow that. They suffer and the way they deal with that suffering causes unimaginable suffering for everyone else. I pity them. I pity the Waltons and the Koch's and others for whom 20 billion dollars, the biggest yachts in the world, more pairs of $2500 shoes, more $10,000 suits are not enough to insulate them from our hands sticking through the post fence to touch their hair or feel their gabardine.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 5:24 PM
Friend of a friend is headed to South America. Asked some light advice on the section between Iquitos and Manaus. I riffed. Here it is.
Dear X: Iquitos to Manaus can be done by riverboat or speedboat: Riverboat is better. You get to stop at the San Luis Leprosy village--there are three in Peru, I think--as well as at several other ports that are pretty interesting, including one where Hassid's grow tons and tons of marijuana. That riverboat will take you to Santa Rosa, the Peruvian town just across the river from Colombia's Leticia--or Leticia itself--which is connected to Brazil's town of Tabatinga--as in across the street. That used to be a wild area, a place where International crooks hung out because if, for instance, the DEA had a warrant for your arrest in Colombia, you'd cross the street and be in Brazil and they'd need a new warrant. Or canoe 200 yards and be in Peru. First time I was there I must have met 10 guys I'd worked with at the Feast of San Gennaro in New York--all wise guys on the lam, living high. It's still pretty cool.
From Leticia you take a boat to Manaus--it's about 6-8 days, depending on the boat/the river. Again, if you have the time, much better than a plane. Not expensive. Rent a cabin if you can swing it. It will be simple, not some fancy-dan cruise ship cabin, but it will mean that you get a couple of chairs to sit in and a place to stash your stuff without having to worry about it. If you just get hammock space you're sort of anchored to that because there will he a couple of hundred people around and the moment you leave to go to the bathroom or take photos or get a beer, someone will be taking your stuff. So yes, cabin is good for the couple of hundred bucks it will cost, even if it's simple.
You get time in Manaus, head up the Rio Negro to where it's not developed and you'll have a grand time.
Key to South America: Outside of Colombia, and eastern Brazil, much of the continent is a matriarchy. It may look like the man is the boss but if it does that's only because the women allow that. In truth, mothering skips a generation, so that 16 year old daughters have babies, the grandma takes care of them. Grandma, 32-35 years old by now, is finally ready to quit her dancing days and raise kids. So she raises the grandkids in a way she never raised her own.
That relates to you in this way: Make friends with grandma, any grandma you run into and since she is the center of her family's universe, all will be well with you in regards to that family. That's important, particularly when your sister--who will be traveling with you part of the trip--is involved: You're a gringo and might not read signals right, so you might over react to a man and if he loses face he'll have to challenge you. But if you've made friends with his mother, she'll intervene and solve everything with a couple of beers instead of blood.
Most of where you're telling me you're headed is not very macho. People won't stab you or anything. Bets off in Lima/Bogata/Santiago, of course: Those are international towns peopled by a huge cross-section of population. But outside of the big cities, nobody is going to hassle you. I can't speak for Argentina because I've never been there--some politician 12 years ago filed something against me as editor in chief of High Times mag and I wound up getting 22-years in absentia, so I won't be visiting there anytime soon. Seems his kid was reading one of the issues on the internet where I was editor and he laid a charge that I was, as editor, pandering drugs to underage kids. Crazy but real, and while the US refused the request for extradition, Argentina went ahead with the trial and it turned out I lost.
When you get closer to leaving, push. I've got some good info and am more than willing to share it with a friend of Phil's.
You're gonna have a great time.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 4:11 PM
Saturday, December 07, 2013
Dear All: Another stranger wrote me a couple of days ago. He/she said that they'd done ayahuasca four times in a short period they now experience, apparently pretty regularly, intense fear at night. The writer said that when he/she goes to bed he has trouble with spirits and shadows. "Once darkness comes, and I\'m usually laying in bed, I leave my body and shadows take me toward a deeper darkness. The feeling I have is one of intense fear. I also have a sense of an intense presence in the room with me..."
I spent a couple of days thinking about it, then wrote this. I hope it helps this person.
Dear X: Well, yeah, I sort of know what you're talking about. First, there is a huge presence in the room. It may be one spirit, may be many. Fact is, they were always there. We share this space in different dimensions with a whole lot of spirits--as children we could feel them, didn't know what they were and called them ghosts. We thought that they only came out at night. But they're always here. Your experience with ayahuasca has probably changed your vibration just enough to now sense them much more than most people would.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 2:51 PM
Friday, December 06, 2013
There was a time while I worked and lived in Peru, where I had a pretty good pulse on some political things. I just stumbled on this old piece about Colombian cocaine and Plan Colombia--from about 2003--and with the continued spraying of poisons on Colombia's coca crop, I thought I'd post this. It's old but still telling.
There is a follow up to it below this--and in real life I probably wrote 15-20 follow up pieces for High Times, NarcoNews.com, WW4report.com and so forth.
WHERE’S THE COCAINE COMING FROM? OR The Coca Bush Cutting Conga Line
By Peter Gorman
Because the coca plant is very slow growing, the questions that come to mind when thinking about all the plants the US has paid to have eradicated in Colombia are: where do the new plants come from and when do they have time to mature?
According to US State Department documents, the Bolivian coca plant, the world standard for making cocaine until the mid-1990s, takes three years from seed to first harvest. Colombian coca, which replaced Bolivian coca as the world’s standard in the late-1990s, grows considerably faster because it is planted from cuttings, not seed. A 2002 CIA bulletin titled “Coca Fact Sheet: A Primer” suggests it can be harvested in as little as 6-8 months.
The same CIA Fact Sheet suggests there are between 14,000 and 45,000 plants per hectare (about 2.5 acres) of coca. If we average that out to 20,000 plants per hectare, there would be 8,000 plants per acre.
Last year, under the aegis of Plan Colombia, more than 250,000 acres of coca were destroyed in Colombia. This year that number will increase to nearly 400,000, or almost every acre of coca under cultivation in Colombia. At 8,000 plants per, that comes to 3,200,000,000 plants. That’s three billion, two hundred million plants.
Where are the cuttings for next year’s crop going to come from if we’ve wiped out their entire crop this year? Where did this year’s three billion cuttings come from if we wiped out most of the crop last year?
Cuttings come from mother plants. If we assumed that a mother plant was capable of producing a startlingly high 1,000 cuttings per annum, there would still need to be 3,200,000 mother plants somewhere. Where are that many mother plants being kept? Has anyone bothered to look for such a large greenhouse?
Of course, even if there were such a greenhouse in Colombia, there would still be the question of distribution: How on earth would anyone distribute three billion cuttings without being noticed?
Those questions were posed to the State Department, which had no real answer. “I’ve never thought of that before,” said Rebecca Brown-Thompson, spokesperson for Rand Beers, the Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs. “Why don’t you ask the Drug Enforcement Administration?”
A DEA spokesman responded with: “I get what you’re getting at, the numbers don’t add up. But Plan Colombia has nothing to do with the DEA. That’s State Department all the way.”
The reason there is no answer is that there are no cuttings. There might be some, of course, but not three billion, not three million. Colombian coca growing, on the scale it’s grown to during the last decade, is now done like it is done in Bolivia and Peru, from seed. Which means it takes three years to grow. And since we’ve been wiping out more and more of the crop annually, there are fewer and fewer mature plants to harvest. Next year, if we’re being told the truth, there won’t be any. Which means there won’t be a harvest in Colombia.
That should wipe out the world’s coca supply for at least three years, at a minimum, by which time any stored cocaine will have hit the streets and been used up. The world ought to be coca dry.
It won’t be. The prices probably won’t even fluctuate. And if they don’t it will mean only one thing: that the elimination of coca from southern Colombia has no effect on world supply. Which will suggest that it never did, that the coca that produces the world supply is grown elsewhere, maybe in unsprayed, protected valleys, or that Peru and Bolivia are still producing sufficient supplies, despite a reduction in their crops.
Of course, that would suggest that Plan Colombia is a sham. That the spraying of southern Colombia and the collateral damage it’s causing—displacement of thousands of people, loss of legal crops and animals and rainforest defoliation—are being done for other ends.
What are those ends? Oil is an obvious answer. There may be others. We won’t find out for a while, but keep your eyes on it. It’ll become apparent soon enough.—Peter Gorman
Someone read this and asked about the oil suggestion I made. I wrote back--and might be off a little as I didn't refer to notes but only memory. Still, the point is well made, I hope.
DEAR X: The Colombia-coca-bush-cutting-conga-line piece--which I always thought, by itself, exposed the entire Plan Colombia in its simplicity, never garnered attention. Either people didn't really care about Colombia or didn't see the implications that I thought I was making very very clearly.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 9:17 AM
Wednesday, December 04, 2013
So a friend asked me what TPP meant. I thought they meant what it meant on Text, so I looked it up and it meant Third Party Position, or something like that. Later, I was told it meant Tea Party Patriots--what an idiot I am. So then I wrote a private letter to my friend, sort of insane, but here are my feelings on the freaking Tea Party:
T: I'm not sure what you were asking me this morning, which is why I didn't reply. You asked what I thought about freedom, monopoly, self-reliance and so forth. Later you asked what TPP meant. I thought you were asking, in general, what that meant in slang, and in slang it generally means Third Party Perspective.
It could also mean Tea Party Patriots, of course.
I have a real real real problem with the Tea Party. They are owned outright by the Koch brothers, the single dirtiest/most immoral privately owned company in the world. The individuals in the Tea Party swear they are for smaller government, more self-reliance and so forth, but they are owned, politically by two brothers--there are three in all--who are 1) philanthropists; 2) Killers; 3) union busters; 4) people who spend billions to get around clean air and clean coal/oil regulations. They own the single biggest amount of Canadian Tar Sands, for instance, which will kill tens of thousands of people here if the Keystone pipeline is allowed to be built while not producing a single, NOT ONE, new job to the USA. They run coal plants that they don't want to bring into the 21st century: Coal plants that are killing tens of thousands of people every year to keep their profits high to the detriment of tens of thousands; they want to clear cut national forests; they run ALEC, the right-wing group that writes legislation for Republicans that benefits the companies that support ALEC, which include the Koch Brothers. And they INVENTED the TEA PARTY! There would not be a single person running for office, or who ran for office in 2008 or 2010 or 2012 who was a Tea Party type--meaning very very stupid, very very selfish, very very stupid again--without the blessing and money of the Koch Brothers. They are the evil among us. They are the freaking devil and the Tea Party is their spawn. The people in the tea party cannot see this, of course. They are blind, dumb, out of touch with reality. They want less government but don't want medicaid or social security touched. Those, along with the fire department, the police department, the people who maintain streets, lights, the post office, are all socialism. True socialism. So the Koch brothers have the TPP completely fooled into thinking they want individualism while backing socialism. Oy vey, I'm nearly Verklempt!
I have never heard a tea party politician or member say a coherent sentence. They are terrified of the nigga in the white house, while not understanding that that man is not the servant, the whites are his servants. He's brilliant, whether you like him or not. He's fantastic, whether you agree with him or not. There has not been a taint of scandal--and I mean real scandal--with this administration: Reagan had 173 people in his administration indicted for felony offenses!!!!!
Nobody in the Tea Party recognizes that they are pigs with rings through their noses being led by some of the most evil people who every lived on this earth--think a real live devil and you'll be close. I'm sorry for them because they cannot think. They watch FOX news and don't realize that it is incorporated as a comedy channel that is forbidden to produce news because it is incapable. They listen to the drug/drink addled Limbaugh and think he makes sense just because he talks fast enough so that you don't hear what he says--which is twaddle. They think Jerry Falwell is a preacher even after the blowjobs in the limo caught on tape and the story of talking to the 700-foot- tall Jesus.
These are people who do not rely on themselves. They have no valuable opinions, they are not self-made but mass produced.
You asked me what I thought and I'm telling you. I got my first job at 5 years old, taking in the neighbors' trash cans. I worked at Louies' candy store making egg creams at 9. I had a double paper route at 10, and the numbers of my routes were 37 and 43, which meant that the bigger kids got to put me on a table, take my shirt off and hit me in the abdomen 80 times each, hard as they wanted, as my initiation. I took a lot of hits, some with rings. I bled for days. I was 10-years old. A couple of years later I was inserting 2500 New York Times and other Sunday newspapers each weekend, meaning I was moving 20- 40 tons of paper in 12 hours.
I know work. I know the Tea Party. They are not workers. They wouldn't have the guts to clean dishes at 175 degrees for 16 hours in a New York restaurant--which also means moving about 30 tons in that time--without a break.
Me? I'll take a dishwasher as the most important person in the universe. When he/she earns more than the Waltons, we'll have a level playing field, finally. Because the dishwashers and guys who move sofas could always be brain surgeons--but I never met a brain surgeon who could be a dishwasher.
Just flying a few thoughts out there. Sorry if I sound ruffled, but the TPP are the stupidest group of misguided dopes I've ever seen, and that includes a lot LOT of dopes. They're being dragged around by two of the richest men in the world and don't even recognize that they are enslaved. That's bad. That's dangerous.
Not sure if I answered your question. I probably just needed to blow off steam. No offense meant at all: These are just general thoughts about what TPP might mean, which is what you asked me, which is where this all started.
I love you and B and you are welcome at my house any time, day or night, no political talk. I promise.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 5:42 PM
Yup, I'm a socialist at heart. I don't think anyone's work is very different than anyone else's work in terms of value. Yes, a heart surgeon is vital and should be compensated for the schooling costs and so forth. But then a dishwasher in a New York restaurant keeps a couple of hundred people a night from getting ill by keeping that water really hot and standing in place for hours. Seems important to me.
And no, I don't think everyone should make the same money. But I do think there ought to be limits. How to do that? I don't know. But the current example is the Walton family, six of whom own 49 percent of the Walmart chain and whose combined wealth of about $100 billion (give or take, depending on who you talk with) is equal to the combined wealth of the bottom 40 percent or so of all the families in the U.S.
Fairly obscene to me. Particularly when you realize they pay their workers an average of $8.81 per hour nationwide. Those workers, doing fairly menial stuff that's done in stores may not seem to be worth more than that to some people. But what the heck, the stores are open 24 hours a day, most stocking is done at night, so a lot of those people are not with their families at night. That means something to me. And then a lot of those people are unloading those big trucks of heavy material; others are working in near freezing conditions in the refrigerator rooms and so forth. And all the check out people are standing on their feet all day. All of that makes those jobs pretty hard, and so, given that there is a good profit from the business, you'd think they might share in it. At least I would. (My team of 12 who work with me on my trips to the jungle get triple the basic Peruvian wage, plus food and walking around money--even on trips where paying that will mean I will go home having lost two or three thousand dollars.)
Okay, but here are the figures: Walmart has 1 million hourly workers in the US. Those workers cost an average of $2,100 per person in government services, which comes to $2.1 billion dollars annually. That's a lot of cheese you and I are picking up to keep the Walton's wealthy, don't you think?
What if the Waltons, starting on January 1, gave every one of those million hourly workers a $100 per week raise? That would come to $100 million a week. Or $5.2 billion a year. Whoa! That's a lot of dough!!! Where would that come from?
Well, it would come from the better than $16 billion profit the company makes. Which would still leave the Waltons and the other Walmart owners a $10.8 billion pie to cut. Remember that the Waltons get half of that so each of the six of them would still earn close to a billion a year.
But you and I wouldn't have to foot nearly the bill for government services for those million hourly workers if they were each making $5,200 per year more. And those workers would probably love getting off food stamps and such--because nobody likes to be on food stamps and such.
So yeah, I'm sort of a socialist that way. I definitely think the Waltons make too much given how their workers are paid.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 5:56 AM
Monday, December 02, 2013
It's Monday morning, first day of school after a 9-day break for Madeleina, a junior in high school this year. She didn't want to go to school and had a variety of reasons: a 101 degree temperature, she felt sick, hadn't done her work over the break, needed to finish a song that will make her millions and she'll give me some if I just give her the day off to finish it.
Madeleina is 16 going on 40 sometimes and other times she's 16 going on six. On the day after any three or more day weekend, and even moreso on the first day after an extended break, she typically gets ill. She swears it's legit. I swear she's been doing it since school got to be school in the 6th grade or so.
So I insisted, won, brought her to school and told her I loved her as she left the car. She didn't say a word, just stormed off.
I knew I'd get a call sooner or later, but didn't expect it so quickly: I'd hardly gotten home before the phone rang and it was the school nurse telling me that my beautiful daughter, Madeleina, was throwing up and I needed to come get her. I laughed, the nurse laughed. "Only happens to be the day after a holiday week, eh?" I asked. "Oh, don't worry, I've got several in here now, all sick and needing to go home. Post holiday sick day," she said.
I picked Madeleina up and as she got into the car I told her there would be no television, no computer, no kindle and no music--unless she was practicing flute or piano--until 4 PM, when school normally lets out. "I wasn't even thinking that..." she began to protest. I told her I was glad to hear it. What she could do, I said, was clean the house, rake the front yard of leaves again--I just did it Friday but it's pretty full again after a couple of windy nights--read real books, study, finish cleaning her room--a three week project that's nearly done--or sleep. I know one thing she will not be doing: She will not throw up. She never throws up unless it's just before school or at school. She's got the technique down to a science.
On the way home I picked up the mail. Two checks for about $400, good. Dropped off some mail: Sent out mapacho (Amazonian) cigarettes to a friend who needs some and paid a bill for Chepa, the wife/ex-wife who's broke right now.
Got home, came inside. Madeleina didn't. She's sitting in the front seat of the truck, moping. Why bother to come in if you can't do anything you wanted to do with the extra day off? I'll let her sit as long as she likes. It's warm outside. But what I'm guessing she'll do is call her mom to come pick her up because she feels so sick. Chepa will arrive, scold me for being so cold to our daughter, then take Madeleina to her house where she'll get to watch television and listen to comedians on the computer all day.
Madeleina does not know that I was 16 once too. I know every trick in the book. The difference was that I just walked out of school if I felt like cutting. I never tried to drag my parents into it. Different world today, but the same. And yes, I'd rather her cut by playing sick than cut to go to a friend's house and have sex and drugs. But that doesn't mean she can look me in the eye and ask me to believe her nonsense, either.
Then there is Marco. He's 25-years-old now, going on 60 sometimes and going on 12 at other times. He hasn't worked in a couple of months because he lost his permanent resident card, and these days if you look hispanic, potential employers ask for that. Then his license expired. Then he lost his social security card. All essentially a valiant effort to prevent himself from getting a job.
A few weeks ago he was desperate enough that he took on in a gas station that pays illegals to work off the books. Marco worked a week and the boss told him he always held onto the first paycheck to cover any employee theft. Okay. So Marco worked another week and asked for his money. They guy said he'd pay cash, $7 an hour, then told Marco he was owed for 40 hours. Marco said no, he'd worked 54 hours the second week and 31 the first week, so he was owed for 84 hours and the rate was $7.25 an hour, minimum wage at least. Marco was fired for speaking back. Then Marco unleashed a torrent on the gas station owner. The owner said that given Marco's attitude, he'd have to put Marco's money in escrow with the "committee" and that Marco could get it when he had all his papers in order.
Marco called, told me the story, then asked about the committee. I said there was no such thing, that the boss probably figured he was an illegal and would be happy with the $280 he was offered, rather than the $616 he was owed.
Marco asked me to help. I said I would. He called back in a few minutes, telling me to do nothing because his girlfriend works at the same station and he didn't want me to do anything that might jeopardize her job. I said okay.
Couple of days later he called again and said he was going to collect his money on Saturday, a cople of days ago, and would I come with him. I said sure.
We went, were steered to an overcrowded office and met the boss. I shook his hand, told him how great it was that his business was doing so well, and that I hoped we could clear things up quickly. The man started to talk about not trusting Marco because of what Marco had said during his torrent on the day he asked for his money. I said yup, he's got quite an angry streak, but that once he got paid, the man would never need to see him again and wouldn't that be a relief. The owner agreed. Then he had him write a paper saying he'd been paid in full and was owed nothing by the owner. Marco wrote what the man said and was about to sign it when I said: Okay, before he signs, and I'll sign on as a witness and let you copy my driver's license, he's got to get paid.
The man grumbled, took out the time sheets did the calculations, came up with $616. He put it on the table. Marco signed. I signed, then let the man copy my driver's license and I signed that paper too. Then we picked up the money. It was good. I thanked him and we left.
Outside, Marco said he wanted to scream at the guy, hit the guy, etc. I told him I'd learned a long time ago that you focus on getting what you need to get, then leave while you're ahead. No point in getting paid, then hitting the guy, then getting arrested for assault. Marco reluctantly said he understood.
Kids are kids forever. I don't know if they ever really grow up all the way until their parents die and they have no choice. I hope I stay alive another 20 years because I don't really mind them being kids once in a while. I'm not always happy with them but I do always love them.
Posted by Peter Gorman at 8:36 AM
Sunday, December 01, 2013
I think I did this a couple of years ago and if so I apologize for boring you a second time. I've just finished the first missive for my upcoming February Amazon group. I'm not sure it's what people expect, though most of the guests have had time to talk with me on the phone and so it's not too too out of the blue when they get this. Still, I'll bet some of this material surprises people and makes them wonder: What the freak did I sign up for anyway?
Here's what I just wrote and sent out:
Posted by Peter Gorman at 3:20 PM